The politics of greed is what keeps this world wrapped in corruption. If you want to stick around for a while longer, I suggest you educate yourself and try to do something constructive to help save what little good, honesty, and trust we have left.

A motto for us old vets: Take one with you!

Use your Go Back and Go Forward commands to get to where you were in a previous file.

Go to Home

Highest Go To numbers are the latest Links.


Go to 10984
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6532
09/05/2007
What Happens When Doctors Go On Strike?
Rob Mackrill – The Daily Reckoning

When doctors in Israel took industrial action and went on strike back in 2000, it highlighted a strange phenomenon – when doctors go on strike, the death
rate plummets.

In this particular instance, the death rate fell by nearly 40% over the strike period. But it's by no means an isolated example.

Back in 1973, Israeli doctors went on strike for 4 weeks and deaths fell by 50% in that month.

The same happened in Los Angeles in 1976, which saw an 18% decline in deaths during industrial action by doctors. When the strike ended and the medical machine started grinding back into action, the death rate returned to usual levels.

The same thing in Bogota in 1972. Doctors withdrew all treatments apart from emergency care. And guess what?

The mortality rate went down by 35%.

It would therefore appear that the more we can avoid medical intervention in our lives, the more chance we have of living longer and healthier. As Dr Robert Mendelsohn, the renowned Chicago MD put it, as far back as 1979: "If doctors reduced their involvement with people and only attended emergencies, there's no doubt in my mind that we'd be better off."

For example, medical errors account for an estimated 40,000 deaths each year in the UK, and have officially become Britain's third biggest killer behind cancer and heart disease.

That's the equivalent to a Jumbo jet-full of passengers perishing every week of the year.

In addition, serious reactions to a prescription drug are also believed to be responsible for a further 250,000 Britons being hospitalised each year – with aspirin, diuretics, warfarin and NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), commonly used for treating such things as arthritis, the main offenders.

But, in the face of this insanity, there is something you can do RIGHT NOW to ensure you DON'T become one of
these statistics.

Agora Lifestyles' Health Sciences institute have put together an amazing book that brings you 265 of the most powerful drug-free, natural cures ever discovered!

They have all been scientifically proven to be AT LEAST as effective as drugs and surgery - AND a whole lot SAFER!

Let's face it, anything that helps you avoid medical intervention has got to be worth a read!

And the even better news is that you can claim a copy for FREE!

Here's the full story.

This really is the most impressive compendium of clear, actionable, direct advice on protecting your health from dozens of illnesses and conditions. It's easy to dip in and out of, full of practical and useful tips and secrets, and it's FREE!

EVERYTHING'S covered, from minor ailments, to heart disease and diabetes, to arthritis, Alzheimer's, MS, obesity - illnesses that threaten everyone at one
point or another.

But whereas most people are just helpless victims, often trying to do something AFTER disease has struck, this book can help PREVENT dozens of ailments and PROTECT you and your family right away!

To find out more about this book, and find out how you can claim a free copy, click here.

With 265 of the most vital health secrets that most people simply don't know about contained in this one volume, this really is a shortcut to better health protection.

Whether you keep the book, or give it to a friend or member of your family, I suggest you take a closer look what this book can offer you right now.
www.dailyreckoning.co.uk



Go to 10983
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6525
Purge of French Intelligence Underway
Wayne Madsen – WMR April 10, 2007

Neo-con purge of French intelligence services begins. Only days after the election of neo-con Nicolas Sarkozy as President of France, the expected neo-con purge of anti-Sarkozy members of the French intelligence and security services has begun. Captain Thierry Tintoni of the Renseignements generaux (RG) (General Intelligence service) has been questioned by a secret tribunal for violating secrecy laws. Tintoni is accused of providing defeated Socialist Party candidate Segolene Royal with damaging information on Sarkozy's conduct while Interior Minister. The French intelligence services will now face the same purges that befell similar neo-con purges of the U.S., British, Australian, Danish, and Italian intelligence services.

WMR's French intelligence sources report that French intelligence services, including the DGSE and DST, expect a Stalinist-type purge by Sarkozy's forces. Expected targets include agents suspected of being too close to the Socialists and those considered too pro-Arab. The Sarkozy team will also target those agents, who, through telecommunication intercepts of Sarkozy and his associates and officials of key American neo-con organizations, including the American Enterprise Institute and the American Jewish Committee, became aware of Sarkozy's secret foreign policy and campaign financing channels. Sarkozy made foreign policy commitments with American neo-cons that ran at odds with the policies of outgoing President Jacques Chirac and Prime Minister Dominique DeVillepin.



Go to 10982
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6541
11/05/2007
Who is Nicolas Sarkozy?

Raanan Eliaz – European Jewish Press

In an interview Nicolas Sarkozy gave in 2004, he expressed an extraordinary understanding of the plight of the Jewish people for a home:

"Should I remind you the visceral attachment of every Jew to Israel, as A second mother homeland? There is nothing outrageous about it. Every Jew carries within him a fear passed down through generations, and he knows that if one day he will not feel safe in his country, there will always be a place that would welcome him. And this is Israel." (From the book " *La République, les religions, l'espérance*", interviews with Thibaud Collin and Philippe Verdin.)

Sarkozy's sympathy and understanding is most probably a product of his upbringing; it is well known that Sarkozy's mother was born to the Mallah family, one of the oldest Jewish families of Salonika, Greece. Additionally,many may be surprised to learn that his yet-to-be-revealed family History involves a true and fascinating story of leadership, heroism and survival.It remains to be seen whether his personal history will affect his foreign policy and France's role in the Middle East conflict.

In the 15th century, the Mallah family (in Hebrew: messenger or angel) escaped the Spanish Inquisition to Provence, France and moved about one hundred years later to Salonika. In Greece, several family members became prominent Zionist leaders, active in the local and national political, economic, social and cultural life. To this day many Mallahs are still active Zionists around the world.

Sarkozy's grandfather, Aron Mallah, nicknamed Benkio, was born in 1890. Beniko's uncle Moshe was a well-known Rabbi and a devoted Zionist who, In 1898 published and edited "El Avenir", the leading paper of the Zionist national movement in Greece at the time. His cousin, Asher, was a Senator in the Greek Senate and in 1912 he helped guarantee the establishment of The Technion — the elite technological university in Haifa, Israel. In 1919 he was elected as the first President of the Zionist Federation of Greece And he headed the Zionist Council for several years. In the 1930's he helped Jews flee to Israel, to which he himself immigrated in 1934. Another of Beniko's cousins, Peppo Mallah, was a philanthropist for Jewish causes who served in the Greek Parliament, and in 1920 he was offered, but declined, the position of Greece's Minister of Finance. After the establishment of the State of Israel he became the country's first diplomatic envoy to Greece.

In 1917 a great fire destroyed parts of Salonika and damaged the family estate. Many Jewish-owned properties, including the Mallah's, were expropriated by the Greek government. Jewish population emigrated from Greece and much of the Mallah family left Salonika to France, America and Israel. Sarkozy's grandfather, Beniko, immigrated to France with his mother. When in France Beniko converted to Catholicism and changed his name to Benedict in order to marry a French Christian girl named Adèle Bouvier.

Adèle and Benedict had two daughters, Susanne and Andrée. Although Benedict integrated fully into French society, he remained close to his Jewish family, origin and culture. Knowing he was still considered Jewish by blood, during World War II he and his family hid in Marcillac la Croisille in the Corrèze region, western France.

During the Holocaust, many of the Mallahs who stayed in Salonika or moved to France were deported to concentration and extermination camps. In total, fifty-seven family members were murdered by the Nazis. Testimonies reveal that several revolted against the Nazis and one, Buena Mallah, was the subject of Nazis medical experiments in the Birkenau concentration camp.

In 1950 Benedict's daughter, Andrée Mallah, married Pal Nagy Boscay Sarkozy, a descendent of a Hungarian aristocratic family. The couple Had three sons — Guillaume, Nicolas and François. The marriage failed and they divorced in 1960, so Andrée raised her three boys close to their grandfather, Benedict. Nicolas was especially close to Benedict, who was like a father to him. In his biography Sarkozy tells he admired his grandfather, and through hours spent of listening to his stories of the Nazi occupation, the "Maquis" (French resistance), De Gaulle and the D-day, Benedict bequeathed to Nicolas his political convictions.

Sarkozy's family lived in Paris until Benedict's death in 1972, at which point they moved to Neuilly-sur-Seine to be closer to the boys' father, Pal (who changed his name to Paul) Sarkozy. Various memoirs accounted Paul as a father who did not spend much time with the kids or help the family monetarily. Nicolas had to sell flowers and ice cream in order to pay for his studies. However, his fascination with politics led him to become the city's youngest mayor and to rise to the top of French and world politics. The rest is history.

It may be a far leap to consider that Sarkozy's Jewish ancestry may have any bearing on his policies vis-à-vis Israel. However, many expect Sarkozy's presidency to bring a dramatic change not only in France's domestic affairs, but also in the country's foreign policy in the Middle-East. One cannot overestimate the magnitude of the election of the first French President born after World War II, whose politics seem to represent a new dynamic after decades of old-guard Chirac and Mitterrand. There is even a reason to believe that Sarkozy, often mocked as "the American friend" and blamed for 'ultra-liberal' worldviews, will lean towards a more Atlanticist policy. Nevertheless, there are several reasons that any expectations for a drastic change in the country's Middle East policy, or foreign policy in general, should be downplayed.

First, one must bear in mind that France's new president will spend the lion's share of his time dealing with domestic issues such as the country's stagnated economy, its social cohesiveness and the rising integration-related crime rate. When he finds time to deal with foreign affairs, Sarkozy will have to devote most of his energy to protecting France's standing in an ever-involved European Union. In his dealings with the US, Sarkozy will most likely prefer to engage on less explosive agenda-items than the Middle-East.

Second, France's foreign policy stems from the nation's interests, rooted in reality and influenced by a range of historic, political, strategic and economic considerations. Since Sarkozy's landing at the Elysée on May 16 will not change those, France's foreign policy ship will not tilt so quickly under a new captain.

Third reason why expectations for a drastic change in France's position in the Middle-East may be naïve is the significant weight the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs exerts over the country's policies and agenda. There, non-elected bureaucrats tend to retain an image of Israel as a destabilizing element in the Middle-East rather then the first line of defense of democracy. Few civil servants in Quai d'Orsay would consider risking France's interests or increasing chances for "a clash of civilizations" in order to help troubled Israel or Palestine to reach peace.

It is a fair to predict that France will stay consistent with its support in establishing a viable Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, existing side by side with a peaceful Israel. How to get there, if at all, will not be set by Sarkozy's flagship but rather he will follow the leadership of the US and the EU. Not much new policy is expected regarding Iran, on which Sarkozy has already voiced willingness to allow development of civilian nuclear capabilities, alongside tighter sanctions on any developments with military potency.

One significant policy modification that could actually come through under Sarkozy is on the Syrian and Lebanese fronts. The new French president is not as friendly to Lebanon as was his predecessor, furthermore, as the Minister of the Interior, Sarkozy even advocated closer ties between France and Syria. Especially if the later plays the cards of talking-peace correctly, Sarkozy may increase pressure on Israel to evacuate the Golan Heights in return for a peace deal with Assad.

Despite the above, although Sarkozy's family roots will not bring France closer to Israel, the presidents' personal Israeli friends may. As a Minister of Interior, Sarkozy shared much common policy ground with Former Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The two started to develop A close friendship not long ago and it is easy to observe similarities not only in their ideology and politics, but also in their public image. If Netanyahu returns to Israel's chief position it will be interesting to see whether their personal dynamic will lead to a fresh start for Israel and France, and a more constructive European role in the region.



Go to 10981
http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar77.html
OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC Part 77
BUSH & CO. FACING PROSECUTION
by Sherman H. Skolnick 8/5/05


History repeats. Yet, some in the younger generations do not have the time or patience to look back.

In the fall of 1973, a Special Prosecutor, on the track of the Watergate Affair, had compiled witnesses and evidence, which some contend was leading to the prosecution of President Richard M. Nixon for various Federal Criminal offenses .

Nixon had two options:

(A) He could have his attorneys put together a lawyer-like defense, based supposedly on the law and the facts. [As a stooge and scapegoat for the ultra-rich, he might do that. His bosses, the Ruling Elite, however, rely inst ead on the Big Fix, blackmail, terror, bribery, political murder.]

(B) Whatever presidential power Nixon supposed he had, he might use to "chop off the heads" of the prosecutorial team---all of them.

The result was called "The Saturday Night Massacre". After August, 1974, when Nixon resigned facing Impeachment, some smaller newspapers carried the statement of the Foreman of a Federal Grand Jury. The Grand Jury, he said, had v oted True Bills, Federal Criminal Indictments, against Nixon. But, the Justice Department warned the Foreman and the Grand Jurors, that if the indictment was released, they would be greatly harmed and the federal authorities would not protect them, acco rding to the Foreman.

Connecting the dots might show what choices the Occupant and Resident of the White House, George W. Bush, has, if at all.

1. For several years we have been reseaching and investigating bribery and other malign influences used to procure from a Five-Judge majority of the U.S. Supreme Court the arbitrary and corrupt ruling, December, 2000, installing by way of the case of Bush versus Gore, a fictitious president into the Oval Office.

One of the four dissenting judges, John Paul Stevens, issued the most blistering Dissenting Opinion ever made by a high court judge. On the other hand, dissenting Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the subject of threats by the Five, deleted from her Dissenting Opinion certain revealing matters.

2. The kingpin of the infamous Five was Judge Antonin Scalia. He and three judges in the federal appeals court in Chicago, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, one step below the high court in Washington, three were professo rs together and one was law school dean at Rockefeller's University of Chicago Law School.

These four Rockefeller judges, while on the bench, continue to represent the several billion dollar investment portfolio of Rockefeller's University of Chicago. Included are stocks of major corporations whose litigation is ruled upon b y these judges who do not disqualify themselves. Further, by failing to reveal this, these judges violate a federal law requiring a mandatory annual judicial disclosure of income which these judges sign subject to the penalties of perjury.

Particularly arrogant is Judge Scalia. In the law trade he is known as a "Go To Hell Judge". 3. In December, 2000, presenting the position of George W. Bush in the high court case of Bush versus Gore, was Theodore B. Olson, at the time, a private law partner of Eugene Scalia, son of Judge Scalia. Some contend Olson is a "court bagman" in Washington and in the Federal Courthouse in Chicago.

After George W. Bush was thus installed, Olson was made the Solicitor General. In that capacity, he perverted an intellectual property case in the High Court which benefitted Mickey Mouse---Disney---by extending their Copyright 7 5 years, worth many billions of dollars. Funds from Disney and Coca-Cola were involved in corrupting the Unholy Five on the High Court.

In the 9-11 matter, there is a serious controversy whether Olson's estranged wife Barbara (with whom he apparently had not spoken to for some time) actually spoke from a supposed hi-jacked plane directly to Theodore B. Olson. Was it actually a conversation with a call center operator? Was the American CIA involved? Some think so.

Some continue to aver that Barbara Olson did not perish and has a plastic surgeon new face and a wig. And. moreover, that she is parked in seclusion in an Embassy in Sweden. If so. her emergence some day would pulverize the fake story of 9-11 "Moslem terrorists" like the internal planted explosives that took down the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center.

4. On my website, www.skolnicksreport.com, is an extensive series, "Coca-Cola, CIA, and the Courts", in part relating to the corruption of the infamous Five on the High Court in Bush versus Gore. Documented there is how Homeland Security and the FBI run a warehouse separate from the U.S. Supreme Court Building. A box of documents sent by registered mail and addressed to one of the dissenting Judges was unlawfully there blocked by th e American Gestapo.

Instead the documents were sent to a secret federal tribunal supposedly considering misdeeds and corruption of federal judges. Such tribunals keep no name on the matters submitted to them, no public docket, no results, if any, are publ icly disclosed. [Yes, there are such secret tribunals. See parts 9 and 10 of the Coca-Cola series.]

5. A tiny portion of our investigation of the High Court corruption, without mentioning us at all by name, became the subject of a lengthy story in Vanity Fair Magazine, October, 2004 issue. Following this was a forty minute segment ab out this on the Terri Gross Show on National Public Radio.

Risking their future career, some of the law clerks of the Dissenting four judges in Bush versus Gore reportedly stole private secret records of the Infamous Five showing the malign influence worked on the Judges in installing Bush.&nb sp; Instead of investigating the Five High Court Judicial criminals, Homeland Security and the FBI have been threatening and inflicting harm on the Dissenting Four High Court Judges and their brave law clerks.

6. For the first time in memory, an out-of-town prosecutor was brought in to be the new U.S. Attorney in Chicago. Unlike previous Chicago U.S. Attorneys, Fitzgerald was not one of the local political crowd who hope to leave federal off ice after a few years and join the corporate gangsters who while prosecutor were protected.. Patrick Fitzgerald was also named as the Special Prosecutor in the case stemming from the outing of deep cover CIA operative Valerie Plame. Her husb and. former U.S. Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson 4th, was dispatched to the tiny African nation of Niger to find out whether Saddam Hussein was buying yellow cake, that is, uranium, from Niger. Who bothered to note that Iraq has their own ample supply of ur anium not used for developing nuclear weapons?

Upon return, Wilson publicly criticized George W. Bush for the fake story about Saddam getting Niger yellow cake.

7. Valerie Plame headed a vast team of more than one hundred covert agents. Some of them were penetration agents, secretly inserted in countries considered by the U.S. as unfriendly in Africa, the Mid-East, and elsewhere.

Also part of her team were upwards of three dozen, or more, biochemists among other things, studying for or against how to use pandemics to minimize "excess population" , that is kill off mere eaters who supposedly do not produce anythimg "useful".

Several of these biochemists were purportedly adjuncts of various foreign counter-intelligence agencies. Since Plame's covert operations cover was blown, several dozen of these biochemists were murdered. A mere coincidence? One of thos e biochemists murdered, as ordered by Tony Blair for the benefit of George Bush, was Dr. David Kelly, purportedly also with British Counter-Intelligence, MI-6.

8. Overseas, facilities of Coca-Cola act as an American CIA proprietary firm. Covert espionage agents use Coca-Cola's offices and plants as a cover, a place to conveniently hang their hats. The vast Coca-Cola money flow has been used to return to the U.S. to corrupt the High Court case of Bush versus Gore and other high-level litigation.

The Chief Federal Prosecutor in Atlanta, Coke's headquarters, began digging into allegations that Coca-Cola's upper brass were "cooking the books" sort of like Enron. Understanding it was a good time to get out, many of Coke's upper ma nagement quit.

The Atlanta Prosecutor perhaps feared forbidden matters would come out at a trial. Such as that the Coke "book cooking" matters related to the malign influence on the Unholy Five on the High Court in Bush versus Gore. A less than brave prosecutor might jeopardize his career making such matters public.

So instead of a trial there was a settlement. How many incriminating Coke documents were dumped into the Atlanta Prosecutor's shredding machine? How many witnesses were told to "Get lost"? What did the Atlanta Prosecutor do with the load of documents we made available to him?

9. A question remains. Did Valerie Plame, or her husband, know that a sizeable portion of the funds for her team's operations worldwide were funneled through American CIA proprietary Coca-Cola? And that the funds corrupted the High Court?

10. Under the supervision of Chicago Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, several federal grand juries have been examining the route of the release of the information that Valerie Plame was a deep cover CIA operative. outing her being a federal criminal offense.

===A male prostitute, Jeff Gannon, a reputed journalist, attended George W. Bush press conferences, apparently without having been cleared by the Secret Service and the FBI. Gannon asked Bush "soft ball" questions. There is reaon to believe that "Gannon" is actually Johnny Gosch who disappeared or was kidnapped at age 12 and made part of a ring of teen age prostitutes arranged by pedophile Daddy Bush. Omaha. Chicago, District of Columbia.

In recent years, on one-day passes, Gannon visited George W. Bush's White House apartment some 200 times, according to U.S. Secret Service records which do not note if Gannon left each time after one day.

Available to one or more federal grand juries have been witnesses who support the contentions that Bush himself gave directly to Gannon data as to the deep cover secret role of Valerie Plame; and that Gannon reportedly procee ded to distribute such data to various mass media people and others.

=== Another grand jury line of inquiry has been that George W, Bush divulged Plame CIA details to Vice President Richard Cheney and that Cheney, in turn, made the information and documents available to his Chief of Staff, "Scooter" Libby tightly entangled with international swindler Marc Rich (alias Reich) and Israeli intelligence, The Mossad. Libby, in turn, made the details known to NBC "Meet The Press" faker Tim Russert but Russert disputes this route. Marc Rich about 1985, with the illegal aid of then Vice President Daddy Bush, fled the U.S.for Zug, Switzerland, just as a federal criminal indictment was about to fall on Rich accusing him of a billion dollar swindl e.

At the last minutes of the Clinton administration, in 2001, Mark Rich bribed Bill and Hillary Clinton a reputed one million dollars to pardon Rich, the Clintons being urged to do so because of Marc Rich's work in washing spy funds thro ugh the Chicago markets for the unlawful benefit of certain high-level criminals in Israel and elsewhere.

11. From time to time, over the years, Federal Prosecutors in presenting witnesses and evidence behind closed doors, develop problems. Usually, a U.S. District Judge, in secret, is asked to assist. It becomes partly public only rarely when the matter goes on appeal, with a heavily redacted appeal record to the federal appeals court.

Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald was led to believe that, because of her background, Chicago District Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow might assist in secretly resolving some of the grand jury problems centered on George W. Bush facing federal criminal prosecution. She, together with the one who later became her husband, early in their careers, they became a team stationed in Indonesia for the American CIA. They were there in the oil-soaked island nation at a time when, at the behest of CIA, one hundred fifty thousand natives were slaughtered on the unproven charges they were "Communists".

As we have in previous postings detailed, the FBI no longer were tight with, and using as pals, the traditional Italian and Sicilian mafia. The Bureau preferred to protect the Russian mafiya, particularly so in Chicago wher e the Bureau is entangled with the Russian mafiya and uses them for FBI dirty business

The FBI refuses to take action against the Russian mafiya's activities in the Chicago-area in peddling stolen credit cards, superior quality counterfeit paper money, and the Russians, primarily Jews as traitors to their tribe, run the Red Light District with impunity; and the Russian mafiya has taken over the Federal Judge bribery rackets in the Dirksen Building, site of the Chicago Bankruptcy Court, the Chicago U.S. District Court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circui t (appeals from Wisconsin, Illinois, and Indiana).

The Russian mafiya as well has taken over the dirty business of buying and selling Chicago Federal Judgeships, an enterprise formerly engaged in by the traditional mafia. [Visit the series, "Coca-Cola, CIA, and The Courts"]

Judge Lefkow and her husband had a bad conflict of interest. however, which apparently interfered with any aid she might be in unknotting grand jury problems behind closed doors. The Judge and her husband had somehow fallen in wi th the Russian mafiya. Near to the Judge's residence is the Russian Martial Arts Center which somehow boasts on their website and elsewhere that they train U.S. and Russian personnel to be available to the Russian bloody tricks secret political po lice and commandoes, namely the Spitznaz. Taught for such service is how to subdue enemies with mind-control or to kill enemies with your hands, without using guns.

In February, 2005, Judge Lefkow's mother and husband were found in the Judge's residence brutally murdered. As is their rotten habit, the FBI blamed it all on a "lone assassin", a sometime electrician, a Polish immigrant. The FBI conveniently disregarded the closed circuit video operating in the alley behind various other houses, showing the faces of known Russian mafiya killers, pals of the Chicago FBI and some U.S. Marshals, breaking into the rear of the judge's residen ce.

12. One or more of the grand juries have concluded their probe and have voted True Bills, Federal Criminal indictments, against George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, "Scooter" Libby, Condoleeza Rice, and Theodore B. Olson; and several media people not previously mentioned in the monopoly press as implicated. Shown as unindicted co-conspirators are two Judges on the U.S. Supreme Court, William Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia, who are among the Gang of Five also in Bush versus Gore.

Because of the horrendous consequences involved, the Indictments are suppressed and there may be an extended delay until they appear on the Chicago Federal Court open records.

13. The substance of the details in this story have been confirmed to us as being true and correct by high government officials, with spotless records, of the U.S., Canada, and Europe.

14. To distract from the impending release of the indictments and the naming of the unindicted co-conspirators, the Bush White House has caused deadly rumors to circulate.

Such as, that the FBI is tracking in the District of Columbia and elsewhere that certain supposed "terrorists" have suitcase dirty nukes ready to set off in D.C.

Such as, that Bush will declare Martial Law and suspend Habeas Corpus, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Such as the U.S. will be wracked with financial and domestic anarchy as Bush seeks asylum in Brazil, or Australia, or elsewhere overseas.



Go to 10980
http://www.rense.com/general76/cur.htm
Let's Talk About Jews And Elections
By Curt Maynard
5-9-7

I'll make this short. Jews dominate the media period. This is not an anti-Semitic canard, a false accusation, a bigoted remark, or an uninformed opinion. This is an empirical fact. For those out there still in doubt, please read "who rules America."[1] Deconstruct and prove the article wrong if you can, I encourage you to; it will only reinforce the fact in your mind once you realize it's true. I've been accused of anti-Semitism by many different people for refusing to omit the fact that Jews dominate the media in my writings, some people say I should be blaming Zionists, not Jews, but the fact of the matter is, I don't know whether or not all of the Jewish owners and CEO's of the major networks are Zionists, but I do know they are ethnic Jews. I've been accused of racism [nee white supremacism] for saying that blacks commit more than 50% of the murders every year in the United States, despite the fact that United States Department of Justice statistics prove the same. In other words, I am accused of anti-Semitism and racism for writing the truth. So be it, if telling the truth means that I am a racist and an anti-Semite, I can live with that.

France has a population of sixty million. According to the Jewish Virtual Library,[2] France's Jewish population is less that 500,000, meaning that Jews compose less than 1% of the French population. Despite this fact, a Jew, Nicolas Sarkozy is now France's President. His opponent in last week's election, Segolene Royal, is the "life partner" [meaning unmarried anywhere else] of the Jewish François Hollande, leader of France's socialist party. To break it down simply, despite the fact that Jews compose less than 1% of the French population, a Jew and a woman married to a Jew composed 100% of the candidates France had to choose from in regards to the final Presidential election. In any case, Sarkozy's win is being celebrated by Jews worldwide.[3]

Oh come on Maynard, it's just a coincidence, right? Wrong! In the 2004 US Presidential election, the very same unlikely sampling manifested itself among Democratic candidates ­ pay attention ­ this is important. The only real viable choices for Democrats in the 2004 Primary elections were the following:

Howard Dean [Married to a Jewish woman, Judith Steinberg, his children are being raised Jewish.[4]]

John Kerry [Entered the race claiming to be a Catholic until it was revealed that he's actually Jewish, a "surprise" according to Kerry, but nonetheless a FACT]

Wesley Clark [Jewish according Wikipedia.[5] Clark actually addressed a Jewish group during the election stating "I am the oldest son, of the oldest son, of the oldest son -- at least five generations, and they were all rabbis."[6]]

Joe Lieberman [Orthodox Jew][7]

What this means is that 100% of the viable Democratic candidates in the 2004 primary were either Jewish or in the case of Dean, married to a Jew. Now wait, it gets worse.

On the Republican side there was never any doubt that Bush would retain the party's endorsement. Few would argue today that George Bush is without any doubt, the most Philo-Semitic president this country's history. Bush has cast aside American sovereignty by stating publicly that he, and therefore the United States [you and I] will back Israel under any circumstances in a mid East war. Bush's administration has placed more ethnic Jews in highly sensitive positions than any other President in American history, with the possible exception of Clinton, who by the way endorsed another crypto-Jew named Madeleine Albright, who hid here Jewish ancestry[8] in exactly the same way John Kerry and George Allen[9] did. Albright of course was once the Secretary of State where she predictably coddled Israel and did her best to suppress the extent of Israeli crimes committed during the Clinton years.

In regards to Bush and the number of Jews he has appointed to high positions within his administration ­ see here.[10] Of note is Michael Chertoff, who has what amounts to as one of the most powerful positions in the US government today, he is the Director of Homeland Security,[11] an assignment that places him in a position to do just about anything he likes and then to effectively cover it all up. Chertoff was the primary force behind the illegal arrest, and unconstitutional detention and rendition of the world's foremost political prisoner today, Ernst Zundel.[12] Chertoff is of course Jewish and a dual citizen of Israel.

George Allen was once considered to be one of the strongest Republican candidates[13] for the 2008 Presidential run; that is until it was revealed that he too is a Jew pretending to be something else ­ see how Allen responded to a reporter that asked him about his Jewish ancestry ­ talk about angry][14] Why was Allen so angry? Did the reporter reveal something that ruined years and years of careful orchestration? I think so.

The point of writing this short article is to highlight the very unusual fact that ethnic Jews are over-represented by tens of thousands of times in positions of political importance in the United States. Consider that they represent only 2.5% of the United States population and you'll understand how it is that I find their disproportionate representation in Presidential primaries highly unlikely. All of us have been thoroughly indoctrinated with the idea that Jews are indeed special and highly ambitious and this is suppose to explain their large showings in politics, academia, sciences, the media, etc I personally think it far more likely that a Jewish stranglehold on OUR media better explains these discrepancies, I am not particularly impressed by their alleged abilities, after all, look around you; is the world really a better place with Jews at the helm?

In the beginning of this article I noted the fact that France now has a Jewish President. I did this solely to point out in the end, that this phenomenon is not isolated to America, it has plagued Europe for decades and is the real reason Europe has passed draconian "hate crime" and "hate speech" legislation which has resulted in the imprisonment of thousands of European patriots. Jewish politicians are the primary force behind the passage of these laws, just as they are in the United States. These Jews hide behind the cloak of other minorities by using them as if they were the crux of concern, but in fact, these laws are designed for no other reason than to prevent exposure and criticism of ethnic Jews and their Supremacist policies/agenda.

Consider the words of Patrick Grimm, noted Internet author, webmaster of Zionist Watch and political dissident as he comments on an excerpt from the Protocols that cannot be conveniently explained away with cries of anti-Semitism and bigotry:
"Below is just one excerpt from the Protocols that will illustrate to you just how well the Jewish laid plans are progressing along their dire course, the consequences for the rest of us be damned. Oh, but I suppose all the little Jewish civil rights groups would simply label these truths as a "canard", one of their favorite terminologies that they fetch from the bag of tricks when someone turns the heat up. No, it would probably be a "blood libel" as every other foray and examination of Jewish wrongdoing is conveniently named. To read the entire disgusting Zionistic display simply go HERE (and I do advise doing that). Well, here is the excerpt promised":[15]


WE CONTROL THE PRESS

4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

5. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses; if already now there is not a single State where there exist for us any barriers to admittance into what GOY stupidity calls State secrets: what will our positions be then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the person of our king of all the world ....

6. Let us turn again to the FUTURE OF THE PRINTING PRESS. Every one desirous of being a publisher, librarian, or printer, will be obliged to provide himself with the diploma instituted therefore, which, in case of any fault, will be immediately impounded. With such measures THE INSTRUMENT OF THOUGHT WILL BECOME AN EDUCATIVE MEANS ON THE HANDS OF OUR GOVERNMENT, WHICH WILL NO LONGER ALLOW THE MASS OF THE NATION TO BE LED ASTRAY IN BY-WAYS AND FANTASIES ABOUT THE BLESSINGS OF PROGRESS. Is there any one of us who does not know that these phantom blessings are the direct roads to foolish imaginings which give birth to anarchical relations of men among themselves and towards authority, because progress, or rather the idea of progress, has introduced the conception of every kind of emancipation, but has failed to establish its limits .... All the so-called liberals are anarchists, if not in fact, at any rate in thought. Every one of them in hunting after phantoms of freedom, and falling exclusively into license, that is, into the anarchy of protest for the sake of protest...."

Grimm concludes with the following:

"There it is, folks. The 'We Control the Press' dictate has already been achieved. In fact, it is now axiomatic that media is a Jewish domain. Their control of our thoughts and "ways of thinking" is a foregone conclusion. When they state "If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses," we can now safely proclaim "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" for our Jewish kings, lords and masters! Most Americans see events, people, places and things through Jewish eyes and think "Jewishly" in ways that are probably more subconscious than explicit."[16]

Wake up America, you are being deceived!

Some good news, according to an article I read this morning, ABC News is reporting quietly, i.e. on their website, not on their television network, that 2.5 million Americans are no longer watching television as they were one year ago.[17] This is indeed a good sign ­ it reveals that 2.5 million Americans have already woken up!


[1] http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america
[2] http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/jewpop.html
[3] http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=jnx4u4bab.0.o4efv4bab.u7bw8rbab.165&ts=S0238&
p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.israelforum.com%2Fblog_article.php%3Faid%3D735690
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Steinberg_Dean
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_Clark
[6] http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/module/displaystory
/story_id/724/edition_id/4/format/html/displaystory.html
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman
[8] http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/module/displaystory/story_
id/5528/edition_id/102/format/html/displaystory.html
[9] http://www.raisingkaine.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4573
[10] http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/bushlist.htm
[11] http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1175701268012.shtm
[12] http://www.ihr.org/news/030923Zundel.shtml
[13] http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec06/sp_08-18.html
[14] http://www.raisingkaine.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4573
[15] http://zionistwatch.blogspot.com/2007/05/protocols-and-you.html
[16] http://zionistwatch.blogspot.com/2007/05/protocols-and-you.html
[17] http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=3153605



Go to 10979
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/07/04/JChron_200407.html
London, April 20, 2007
A yiddishe revolution in America's media

Some of the most Waspy papers in the US have just been acquired by the most Jewish of publishers

NOT so long ago, the very idea of the Tribune Company, owner of the Chicago Tribune, Newsday, Baltimore Sun and the Los Angeles Times falling into Jewish ownership would have looked preposterous. The New York Times and Washington Post may glory in their Jewish antecedents. But the Tribune, the creation of the Anglophobe colonel Robert McCormick, an American-firster who thought the Nazis were Europe's problem, not America's, was despised in Jewish households.

The colonel loathed the wartime US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, whom he viewed as being in cahoots with the British and a traitor to his social class. In McCormick's view, FDR was unsound because he was in thrall to the Jews. Now, after a very public auction, the Tribune Company has fallen into the hands of a very Jewish entrepreneur, Sam Zell, described by the American Jewish paper The Forward as a "billionaire boychik".

At the state-of-the-art Washington bureau of the main titles, the reporters in their gleaming steel work pods regard the arrival of Zell as the second coming. Uncertainty is the enemy of newspapers and ever since the Tribune group was put on the block, there has been nervousness about new ownership.

Zell, described by Forbes magazine as the 52nd-richest man in America, is as Jewish as you can get. The son of Polish refugees from the Shoah, he attends a traditional synagogue regularly, is a big donor to Israeli- and Jewish causes and made most of his money in property. But unlike many Jewish philanthropists, he shows little interest in associating with the rich and the great, eschews the idea of having his name plastered across donated buildings, and at the age of 65 years he still prefers denim to Brooks Brothers.

Even though Zell is a neophyte when it comes to the press, he has eased concerns with plans for an employee shareholder ownership plan which would give workers a stake in the enterprise and incentivise them to "deliver the goods".

In the financial world, Zell, whose original family name was Zielonka, is known as the "grave dancer" because of his success in picking up burnt-out businesses, cutting costs, fixing them up and turning them around.

It might have been thought that the Tribune company -- which aside from its main newspaper titles also owns 25 television stations, the Chicago Cubs baseball team and its historic ground, Wrigley Field -- is hardly the kind of burnt-out business in which Zell specialises. But most American big-city newspapers are currently regarded as in the emergency ward.

Circulations even for emblematic titles like the Los Angeles Times have been tumbling, advertising revenues are under pressure from the Internet and the magic pill of making online news and information pay is still a long way off. The days when the Chandler family, founders of the LA Times, ruled over California's media have gone. The family, which dominated California's power elites, sold the paper to the Tribune in 2000, ending a 120-year association.

This title, like the Chicago Tribune, was also known for its trditional, preppie background and its disdain for Hollywood and things Jewish.

Yet in many ways, the LA Times ought to be the jewel in the crown of Tribune. It ranks alongside the Washington Post and New York Times in the annals of quality journalism in the United States. Its reputation began to suffer when it became part of a media conglomerate, losing the special edge which comes with local ownership.

Indeed, it is thought that Zell could recover some of his investment rapidly were he to sell the paper on to another Jewish tycoon, the movie and record producer David Geffen, one of the founders of Dreamworks with Steven Spielberg.

The scenario is favoured by some of the paper's workforce. Geffen is much more of a political figure than Zell, having been an early supporter of Bill Clinton. More recently, he raised $1.3 million (£650,000) for Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama at a star-studded Hollywood fundraiser.

Were Geffen to acquire the LA Times, it would be a transformational deal.

The big question for British Jews when the Telegraph changed hands in 2004 was whether the new owners, the Barclay brothers, would be as friendly towards Israel and the Zionist cause as Lord Black. Among British media, which are often hard on Israel, the Black Telegraph had been a beacon of fairness. The US media are very different. They generally start from the point of view that Israel is a good thing, an exemplar of democracy in a crazy part of the world and, crucially, an important strategic ally of the United States.

Yet the histories of the Chicago Tribune, banned from many Jewish households over the decades, and the LA Times have been very different, despite the large Jewish populations in their respective cities. Ownership by Zell and possibly by Geffen, if the LA Times is disposed of, would be likely to change the complexion of the papers.

Zell and Geffen may not be traditional newspaper proprietors, but both are overtly Jewish and pro-Israel. They would bring a different perspective to the previous American first-owning families, whose culture still lingers on the fringes.

Zell insists he will leave journalism to those who know about it. But newspaper proprietors always find it hard to keep their hands out of the cookie jar.

Alex Brummer is City Editor of The Daily Mail



Go to 10978
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/250407_brzezinski_911.html
The three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together." (The Grand Chessboard p.40)


Human-Deficient Brzezinski Exposed for 9/11 Culpability
Security Attempts to Seize Activist's Video Tape and Intimidate Free Speech During Oration by
'Grand' Architect and Trilateral Player Serving Agenda of Would-Be Global Landlords


We Are Change activist and 9/11 Truther Luke Rudkowski narrowly escaped from literal goons overseeing a Zbigniew Brzezinski speaking engagement. The brute force now closely guarding the establishment objected, it seems, to the unmasking question aimed at the former member of the Carter Administration, who was selected for public service-- along with the majority of that administration-- from the more private, but no less influential Trilateral Commission, founded by David Rockefeller.

Security not only tried to silence and remove the critical activist, it attempted to confiscate his video tape of the encounter by force, cornering Rudkowski into the position of running for escape after announcing that "9/11 was an inside job" and "national sovereignty will prevail" during his escorted departure.


Click HERE for Google Video


Luke's limited opportunity to put forward a question to Brzezinski was wisely used in a quick, but articulate and carefully worded message that seeks to set-aside Brzezinski's layers of faux-legitimacy and address actual, relevant issues which actually affecting the real world-- peeling off deceptive and charming rhetoric in which the punch-drunk crowd readily indulged:

"Earlier on in this year, you gave a speech to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee where you alluded to the fact that the Bush Administration may stage a terrorist attack to justify a military action against Iran. And then in your book, you also addressed the fact that a memo where Bush and Blair discussed painting a U2 spy plane in U.N. colors so Saddam would shoot it down."

"Although you have argued that deceptions to the American public may be necessary in order to deal with these enemies, how are we to know how many other terrorist attacks have been state-sponsored false flag incidents including the largest one-- the attacks of 9/11?"

"How do we know, how do the American people know that 9/11 wasn't staged, wasn't engineered by you, David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission, the C.F.R. (crowd begins to boo, hiss and react) and Bilderberg Group, sir?"

"It's a question. Answer my question. You sponsored al Qaida, sir. You are a criminal. You sponsored al Qaida. In 1979, you gave them money. That's true. You are C.F.R. scum. You are C.F.R. and New World Order scum. You and David Rockefeller will never have a New World Order. National sovereignty will prevail."

As the question was quashed, the crowd cheered at Brzezinski's insistence that Rudkowski "sit down and shut up." The crowd yells back to Luke "You are scum."

The New York based group We Are Change has had its share of challenges to the right of free speech and has had to fight for the rights of alternate media, which is largely internet-based and thus often appears less legitimate than establishment-cosy mainstream media. Recently the group was harassed by police outside ABC Studios during a peaceful demonstration of support for Rosie's public assertion of 9/11 Truth.

During another demonstration in front of the new Building 7, police confiscate the group's camera and literally accuse them of being "terrorists." SEE VIDEO BELOW



Here, Luke asserted that he "has every right" to security over challenges that his rights to free speech and existence as media are somehow invalid.

Rudkowski's attempt to bring accountability to Brzezinski's doorstep is not the vain act of demanding attention from notable civil servants, nor the pursuit of some mere messenger in New World Order false-flag terror. Brzezinski's penchant for designs of world architecture and provocateured re-mapping is well documented, primarily by the thoroughly-articulated visions of American primacy and geopolitical dominance penned by his own hand. He is a key tactician in the globalist system and his strategy is clearly laid out in his book, The Grand Chessboard.

His role in 9/11 itself is not directly established, yet statements of cold strategy reveal his callous attitude towards the worth of human life and its relevant price towards geostrategic goals:

"The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor." (The Grand Chessboard pp 24-5)

"The pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being." (The Grand Chessboard p. 35)

"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (The Grand Chessboard p. 211)

That crafted policy-- dating to 1997-- was echoed only three years later by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), a think tank highly influential in the formation and focus of the Bush Administration's foreign policy.

The PNAC policy paper Rebuilding America's Defense mapped out a plan for American primacy and suggested-- spinning Brzezinski's notion of a "sudden threat" causing a "shock effect" like Pearl Harbor to foster support into an idea of their own:

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."

The hypothetical strategy for cultivating American power out of human sacrifice and a "widely-perceived direct external threat" was conveniently picked up by the Council on Foreign Relations, of which Brzezinski has been a long-time member, just three days after the 9/11 attacks:

"There is a chance for the President of the United States to use the disaster . . . to carry out what his father - a phrase his father used I think only once, and it hasn't been used since - and that is a New World Order."
- Senator Gary Hart at the Council on Foreign Relations, September 14, 2001

While the PNAC doctrine was clearly instrumental in the approach to an Iraqi war, Brzezinski's idea goes further, not simply seeking a war for profit, but to craft an entire cultural pre disposal towards world dominance led by a completely hegemonic and imperial America-- making the case for America as the "first and last truly global superpower."

"In brief, for the United States, Eurasian geostrategy involves the purposeful management of geostrategically dynamic states and the careful handling of geopolitically catalytic states, in keeping with the twin interests of America in the short-term: preservation of its unique global power and in the long-run transformation of it into increasingly institutionalized global cooperation."

This framework for American hegemony in context of regional and global cooperation is echoed and reinforced in true PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD style by influential academics and political scientists, including the likes of John Ikenberry, Francis Fukyama and Samuel Huntington.

His foreign policy methods have predominated the think tank and intellectual circles that feed politicians in power, with younger foreign policy elites like James B. Steinberg (member of Bilderberg, Trilateral, C.F.R., former Brookings Institute and current Dean at the L.B.J. School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas) waiting to take the lead in mapping out a policy approach aimed at achieving ruthless goals of world control and targeting geostrategic pivots that would spearhead regional cohesion and insure regional influence-- with Iran-control in key focus.



James B. Steinberg, for one, writes justifying "preventive war" with Iran on the agenda's horizon -- selling its efficacy in dealing with even "latent" threats like "terrorism and weapons proliferation" while carrying the legitimacy of policy agreed upon by a United Nations security council, or failing that, at least a "regional organization," or perhaps even a "coalition of like-minded states" which might prevail in relative legitimacy-- revealing that truly sovereign bodies would be reduced to their relevant function and usefulness in justifying an end through any means beneficial.

"Conditional sovereignty is central to a new norm of state responsibility."

"One problem with the Bush doctrine, then, is not that it is overly reliant on preventive force but that it too narrowly conceives of its use."

"The Bush administration got the first step right, and the logic of its arguments builds toward the second. But it has gotten step three wrong. Unilateralism is not the only alternative to the Security Council."

Calling out such treasonous behavior is important in activism, for reasons only beginning with exposure. Willfully provocating war for strategic purposes does not fit within a gray world where the end-justifies the means; it is the regrettable case of unrestrained, elite madmen plotting and executing for world dominance and personnel profit.

Zbigniew Brzezinski doesn't favor war with Iran, but definitely concurs with Iran's strategic preeminence. He hopes diplomacy will be sufficient to facilitate regional dominance, noting the risks war could have in triggering Russia or even China into war over threats to its interests and/or sense of space. He also cites the potential strain on military capabilities. He is, though, clearly intent on influencing Iran to the greatest degree possible, exercising force if it becomes necessary.

"That puts a premium on maneuver and manipulation in order to prevent the emergence of a hostile coalition that could eventually seek to challenge America's primacy..."(Regarding Middle East strategy in The Grand Chessboard p. 198)

Going it the calm route could translate into faster control of more pieces. Brzezinski wants the whole map, not just the short gain cash cows, and won't advocate taking Iran alone at the cost of sacrificing EU-courted Ukraine and Caucasus/ Central Asian prizes, including Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia and Armenia, which he assesses as all potentially vulnerable if Russia stays weak [The Grand Chessboard].


Click for a larger image

He has stated, in justification for his tactical, financial and organizational founding of the Taliban during the late 70s as a means of sufficiently weakening the Soviet Union:

"Which is more important in world history: The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet Empire? A few over-excited Islamists or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”

The modern-day Machiavelli puts his "grand" scheming above the limitations of legitimate threat response, provocateured threat response and even Steinberg's pseudo-justified "latent" threats-- he's goes right for the spoils themselves as justification.

War actually justified-- publicly-- as war for the sake of world domination and primacy of the American way. A visionary-- past the vain pretense of cause. A man who wants true results. Advanced Hegelian thinking, skipping the gaming steps of problem and reaction-- Zbigniew Brzezinski has a solution.


Zbigniew Brzezinski with Osama bin Laden, 1979

Activist Luke Rudkowski was apt to meet the clear-headed and cynical approach of Brzezinski with well-read and cutting comments dissecting the real agendas guiding the smokescreen force of false-flag attacks and provocateured events that lie at the heart of the true enemy at hand.

It is important to meet as many of our "public servants" with questions about 9/11 Truth and demand their attention and attempt to harness their representative power to turn around the New World Order government-- which is riding away on the robust engine of American economic and military might.

However, it is important to keep focus on the real forces pulling the strings. Brzezinski is something of the helmsman functionary, right hand man to the globalist owners who demand orchestration and control. Rudkowski, a founding member of We Are Change, was also instrumental in organizing protest at the Council on Foreign Relations during the multi-pronged demonstrations on the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 false-flag attack-- seeking to hold responsible not only the functionaries who carried out the state-sponsored attack, but the ideas behind that, and those who shape those ideas.

Rudkowski is not grandstanding, but attacking with precision, when he ends the video with a message: "Yeah, Brzezinski, you got yours." He certainly had it coming.

"This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept."

--- Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter



Use your Go Back and Go Forward commands to get to where you were in a previous file.