The politics of greed is what keeps this world wrapped in corruption. If you want to stick around for a while longer, I suggest you educate yourself and try to do something constructive to help save what little good, honesty, and trust we have left.

A motto for us old vets: Take one with you!

Use your Go Back and Go Forward commands to get to where you were in a previous file.

Go to Home

Highest Go To numbers are the latest Links of all coruption pages.


Go to 13274
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=8613
Wheat Crop Failures Could Be Total
04-25-2008
Money News

On top of record-breaking rice prices and corn through the roof on ethanol demand, wheat is now rusting in the fields across Africa.

Officials fear near total crop losses, and the fungus, known as Ug99, is spreading.

Wheat prices have been soaring this week on top of already high prices, and futures contracts spiked, too, on panic buying.

Experts fear the cost of bread could soon follow the path of rice, the price of which has triggered riots in some countries and prompted countries to cut off exports.

David Kotok, chairman and chief investment officer of Cumberland Advisors, said the deadly fungus, Puccinia graminis, is now spreading through some areas of the globe where "crop losses are expected to reach 100 percent.”

Losses in Africa are already at 70 percent of the crop, Kotok said.

"The economic losses expected from this fungus are now in the many billions and growing. Worse, there is an intensifying fear of exacerbated food shortages in poor and emerging countries of the world,” Kotok told investors in a research note.

"The ramifications are serious. Food rioting continues to expand around the world. We saw the most recent in Johannesburg.

"So far this unrest has been directed at rising prices. Actual shortages are still to come.”

Last month, scientists met in the Middle East to determine measures to track the progress of "Ug99,” which was first discovered in 1999 in Uganda.

The fungus has spread from its initial outbreak site in Africa to Asia, including Iran and Pakistan. Spores of the fungus spread with the winds, according science journal reports.

According to the Food and Agriculture Office (FAO) of the United Nations, approximately a quarter of the world’s global wheat harvest is currently threatened by the fungus.

Meanwhile, global wheat stocks are at lows not seen in half a century, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Scientists fear that the spores could spread on the wind and reach the U.S. and Canada or Europe.

"It will take five to eight years to genetically engineer a resistance,” said Kotok. "In the interim, U.S. agriculture faces higher risk.”

Kotok is worried that governments around the globe are reacting to the crisis — which he believes is as big of a threat as bird flu — inappropriately by artificially lowering the prices of domestic wheat, and raising export taxes on wheat.

William Gamble, president of Emerging Market Strategies, tells MoneyNews that artificial mechanisms put in place by governments could be as much to blame for the crisis as anything.

"Twenty countries have put food in price controls or export restrictions,” Gamble says.

"Others have restricted futures markets. It is the politicians who are interfering in the markets to protect themselves, and that causes the problem.”



Go to 13273
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=8620
Police Get Black Uniforms To Instill Fear
04-25-2008
Fox News

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. — Springfield's men in black are returning.

The city's new police commissioner, William Fitchet, says members of the department's Street Crime Unit will again don black, military-style uniforms as part of his strategy to deal with youth violence.

Fitchet's predecessor, Edward Flynn, had ditched the black attire as part of an effort to soften the image of the unit. Flynn left Springfield in January to become the police chief in Milwaukee.

Sgt. John Delaney told a city council hearing Wednesday that the stark uniforms send a message to criminals that officers are serious about making arrests.

Delaney said a sense of "fear" has been missing for the past few years.



Go to 13272
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=8630
Mom Gets Fined For Dropping Food
04-25-2008
London Telegraph

A single mother has been fined £75 for “littering” after her daughter dropped a piece of sausage roll on the pavement.

Sarah Davies, 20, was feeding Chloe, four, when the roll slipped from her grasp inches from her daughter’s mouth and fell to the floor.

The incident happened in Hull city centre on Monday and a fixed penalty fine arrived in the post just three days later.

Miss Davies said that pigeons swooped down to eat the remains just moments later.

She said: “I had just picked up Chloe from nursery. We were both hungry so I got us a sausage roll to share. I had a bite and then bent down to give a bit to Chloe who was on her bike.



Go to 13271
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=8632
Many States Are In Recession
04-25-2008
AP

The finances of many states have deteriorated so badly that they appear to be in a recession, regardless of whether that's true for the nation as a whole, a survey of all 50 state fiscal directors concludes.

The situation looks even worse for the fiscal year that begins July 1 in most states.

"Whether or not the national economy is in recession—a subject of ongoing debate—is almost beside the point for some states," said the report to be released Friday by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The weakening economy is hitting tax revenue in a number of ways: People's discretionary income is being gobbled up by higher food and fuel costs, while the tanking housing market means people are spending less on furniture and appliances associated with buying a house.

The situation is grim in Delaware, with a $69 million gap this year, and bleak in California, with a projected $16 billion budget shortfall over the next two years, the report said. Florida does not expect a rapid turnaround in revenue because of the prolonged real estate slump there.

By mid-April, 16 states and Puerto Rico were reporting shortfalls in their current budgets as the revenue those budgets were built on—typically, taxes—fell short of estimates. That's double the number of states reporting a deficit six months ago.

The NCSL said the news is even worse for the upcoming fiscal year, with 23 states and Puerto Rico already reporting budget shortfalls totaling $26 billion. More than two-thirds of states said they are concerned about next year's budgets.

The results are consistent with a drumbeat of bad economic news for states that several budget groups have produced in the past few months.

Last week, the Washington-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said 27 states are reporting projected budget shortfalls next year totaling at least $39 billion.

President Bush said Tuesday that the economy was not in a recession but a period of slower growth. However, some economists have pointed to the string of declines in manufacturing orders to argue that the economy has fallen into a recession.

Bolstering their position, the Commerce Department reported Thursday that sales of new homes plunged in March to the lowest level in 16 1/2 years. The government also reported that orders to factories for big- ticket goods fell for a third straight month in March, the longest string of declines since the 2001 recession.

Some states "have declined so much that they appear to be in a recession," the NCSL report said.

It also noted the silver lining for states where the economy is based on energy, such as North Dakota and Wyoming. Alaska is making so much money from oil that it announced an estimated surplus next year of $8 billion, almost twice the state's annual budget.

In North Dakota, revenue is above legislative predictions by 13 percent, and in Louisiana, the oil and gas sector is robust.

"For energy-producing states, the fiscal situation is strong and the outlook is good," the report said.

Among other findings:

_More than half the 16 states reporting deficits this year have cut spending, including $1 billion by Florida lawmakers last year and across-the-board cuts in Nevada. At least eight states are debating raising taxes or fees, including a proposed $1-per-pack cigarette tax increase in Massachusetts to raise $175 million.

_Twelve states, including Georgia, Idaho and Illinois, reported that personal income tax collections were failing to meet estimates, and in eight of these, collections were even below a reduced forecast.

_Many states, including Alabama, Arizona, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada and Wisconsin, plan to tap their rainy day funds, which contain money set aside for fiscal emergencies. Nevada may use its entire rainy day balance.



Go to 13270
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19800.htm
US rebuked Over Syria Nuclear Case

By Al Jazeera and agencies

25/04/08 "al Jazeera" -- - The head of the UN nuclear monitoring agency has criticised the US for withholding intelligence information that it says showed the construction of a nuclear reactor in Syria.

Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), on Friday also hit out at Israel for bombing the site before inspectors could investigate.
Washington alleged that the facility had a military purpose until Israel destroyed it in a bombing raid last September.

The watchdog was critical of both the US and Israel for their handling of the matter.

"In light of the above, the director-general views the unilateral military action by Israel as undermining the due process of verification that is at the heart of the non-proliferation regime," it added.

The agency said it was taking seriously the allegations that were passed on by the United States on Thursday and will investigate the findings.

"[We] will treat this information with the seriousness it deserves and will investigate the veracity of the information," it said.

"Syria has an obligation under its safeguards agreement with the IAEA to report the planning and construction of any nuclear facility."

'Come clean'

The White House said in a statement on Thursday that Syria "must come clean" over its alleged secret co-operation with North Korea on the reactor.

It also described the alleged assistance as a "dangerous manifestation'' of North Korea's nuclear proliferation activities, but said it would continue six-party talks to try to resolve the nuclear standoff with the isolated nation.

The claims follow a briefing of US congressional officials in Washington DC by intelligence chiefs, including William Hayden, the CIA director.

However, some US legislators earlier warned that the claims could wreck vital six-party talks on North Korea's nuclear programme.

Later on Thursday, Syria's ambassador to the US dismissed claim as a "ridiculous story".

Imad Moustapha told Al Jazeera that his government maintained there was no evidence of any alleged secret nuclear activity.

Timothy Savage, an analyst from the Nautilus Institute, told Al Jazeera that the US claims could be treated with a degree of sceptism.

"The Bush administration doesn't have a great track record with intelligence, so it's natural that people will approach this with some scepticism," he said.

'Nuclear facility'

The controversy began last September, when an Israeli air raid destroyed a target in Syrian territory which some reports later said was a nuclear facility being built with North Korean help.

Syria, a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), has maintained in the past that the site was an unused military facility.

It later razed the site and built a larger building in its place.

The target of Israel's raid has been veiled in secrecy, with US intelligence and government officials refusing to confirm for months that such a raid even took place.



Go to 13269
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j3TJ_LsBMrvXU2HxiZssd4cBl-4g
Malaysia's ex-PM Mahathir wants Iraq war leaders on war crimes charges

LONDON (AFP) — Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad has called for an international tribunal to try Western leaders with war crimes over the war in Iraq, a spokesman for the organisers said.

In a speech at Imperial College, London, Mahathir called for a tribunal to try US President George W. Bush plus former prime ministers Tony Blair of Britain and John Howard of Australia for their part in the conflict, said a spokesman for the Muslim group the Ramadhan Foundation, which set up the event.

Spokesman Mohammed Shafiq told AFP that Mahathir, who was in office from 1981 to 2003, wants to see the trio tried "in absence for war crimes committed in Iraq.

"It was a opportunity for students to put a range of questions about war crimes and the international situation.

"He said that people have to stop killing each other and use arbitration, negotiation and discussion as an alternative to violence, war and killing."

On the war in Iraq, Mahathir spoke about "the thousands dying, the economic war, the power of oil and how we could utilise some of these tools to have a leverage against the people who commit countries to war," Shafiq said.

He purposely did not speak about or answer questions from students on the political situation in Malaysia, said Shafiq.

Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi is facing growing demands to quit, following an unprecedented electoral setback in March.

More than 450 people attended the speech and about 200 more had to be turned away.

Mahathir was in Cuba earlier this week to take part in the first International Conference of the Cuban Centre for Studies on Defence Information.

The Ramadhan Foundation is a leading British Muslim youth organisation working for peaceful co-existence and dialogue between communities.



Go to 13268
http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1047.shtml
Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor
Jul 31, 2006, 00:19

Think of this as part two of Recherche du trillions perdu, my Online Journal article on Dov Zakheim, former Bush appointee as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as I mentioned, was buried under 9-11’s rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim’s watch.

Yet on May 6, 2004, Zakheim took a lucrative position at Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the most prestigious strategy consulting firms in the world. One of its clients then was Blessed Relief, a charity said to be a front for Osama bin Laden. Booz, Allen & Hamilton then also worked closely with DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is the research arm of the Department of Defense. So the dark card was shifted to another part of the deck.

Judicial Inc’s bio of Dov (linked below) tells us Zakheim was/is a dual Israeli/American citizen and an ordained rabbi and had been tracking the halls of US government for 25 years, casting defense policy and influence on Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. He is, as I described him earlier, the bionic Zionist. In fact, Judicial Inc points out that most of Israel’s armaments were gotten thanks to him. Squads of US F-16 and F-15 were classified military surplus and sold to Israel at a fraction of their value.

Judicial Inc also points out that Israel, a country of 4.8 million Russian and Polish Jewish émigrés, flies on one of the biggest Air Forces in the world, thanks to Dov. Conflict of interest here? Depends on what you’re interested in. That is, in 2001 Dov was CEO of SPS International, part of System Planning Corporation, a defense contractor majoring in electronic warfare technologies, including remote-controlled aircraft systems, and the notorious Flight Termination System (FTS) technology that could hijack even a hijacked plane and land or crash it wherever.

More from the resume: Wikipedia points out that Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of the Project for the New American Century’s position paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, advocating the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern Muslim nations.

As to Dov’s hell-raiser lineage, Judicial Inc points out that Grandpa Zakheim was born in 1870, Julius Zakheim (Zhabinka), in the Ukraine, a Russian rabbi who married a relative of Karl Marx. He was a Menshevik/Bolshevik and played a leading role in the 1905 turmoil that paved the way for the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. The Bolshevik master plan called for the state of Israel, which was chosen for its proximity to the world's oil and an area of religious significance.

Dov’s Father, Rabbi Jacob I. Zakheim was born in 1910 and reared in Poland’s swarm of Zionist hard guys, read assassins and bombers. His Polish town, near Bilaystok, also brought us Yitzhak Shir, and family friends included Menachem Begin and Moshe Arens. Dov’s father was an active member of Betar, formed in 1923 in Riga, Latvia. Its goal was to control the Middle East (and its oil). It was known that the Jewish people needed their own country and they chose Palestine and claimed it a Jewish state “on both sides of the Jordan.”

Betar was in essence a terrorist organization formed because Zionists were sick of being chased from and arrested in country after country. They wanted both a place to escape and a base for their power. Betar joined forces with the Haganah, Irgun, and Stern gangs. With no prospect of a Jewish state in sight, they argued that armed struggle against the British was the only way. Since Britain occupied Palestine and was containing them they went on a blood feast of bombings that killed hundreds of British soldiers. The British pulled out, but the Zionists continue to maul the Arabs to this day.

For a concise history on the Formation of Israel in 1947, I suggest this link to theocracywatch.org.

For an interesting look at “The United States and the Recognition of Israel: A Chronology” compiled from Harry S. Truman and the Founding of Israel by Michael T. Benson, link above. For a rounded look at Israel, see Wikipedia.

Returning to Dov: he was born in Brooklyn in 1943 and attended exclusive Jewish schools, spent summers in Israel Zionist camps, which trained the Zionists of the future. As to Dov’s formal education, he graduated from Columbia University in 1970 and the University of Oxford in 1972. From 1973 to 75, he attended the London school of Jewish studies, described as a “Harry Potter” type cauldron; among the subjects Jewish supremacy, Advanced Bible, Talmud, Jewish Mysticism, Holocaust, Anglo-Judaica, and Zionism. After, he was ordained a Rabbi. From 1975 to 80, Zakheim was an adjunct professor at the National War College, Yeshiva University, Columbia University and Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut.

As he stepped into the Reagan administration, he talked them into funding development of the Lavi Fighter at a cost of $3 billion. The Lavi was a total flop and Israel dropped it, though it owed $450 million in contract fees that were cancelled. Israel, according to Judicial Inc, also created a story that China was eager to buy the Lavi. Zakheim convinced Reagan that China had to be sandbagged. Reagan gave Israel $500 million for its lost contracts. Reagan then threw in a wing of F-16’s as a bonus and sign of good will. Do we see a pattern here, personal, familial, career-wise, of over-the-top Israeli advocacy?

Again, during Zakheim’s tenure as Pentagon controller from May 4, 2001, to March 10, 2004, over $3 trillion dollars were unaccounted for. Additionally, military Information was jeopardized and military contractors billed the US for Israeli items: $50 million dollar fighter jets were rated as surplus and the list rolls on. As the scandal of the missing trillion dollars surfaced and Dov resigned, Israel was handed the finest fighter jets in the US inventory while 15 percent of US jets were grounded for lack of parts. In whose best interest was this?

But Dov is not alone. He is one of an elite group of Jewish Americans/Israelis who inter-marry and enter government. They and their Christian counterparts are called neocons and their sole purpose is directing US policy. Most of them are dual citizens and few serve in the US military. Think of Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Richard Perle, Ben Wattenberg, to mention a few. Whether their motivation is anger at the Muslim world, seen as a religious and territorial enemy, or a deep-rooted reaction to the Holocaust, the culmination of European anti-Semitism, their reactionary militarism becomes a world-threatening force unto itself. Hence our concern.

Dov and the World Trade Center

Perhaps not coincidentally in May 2001, when Dov served at the Pentagon, it was an SPS (his firm’s) subsidiary, Tridata Corporation, that oversaw the investigation of the first “terrorist” attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. This would have given them intimate knowledge of the security systems and structural blueprints of the World Trade Center. From the '90s through 2001, WTC Security was handled by Securacom, a Kuwait-American firm, on whose board Marvin Bush, the president’s brother, sat. After 9/11, Securacom was let go, changed its name to Stratosec, and was delisted from the Stock Exchange in 2002.

According to Conspiracy News.net writers Shadow and ‘Pax’ in Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy, (and I suggest you look at this link) “According to the SPC website (4), a recent customer at that time was Eglin AFB, located in Florida. Eglin is very near another Air Force base in Florida-MacDill AFB, where Dov Zakheim contracted to send at least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker lease agreement. (5)

”As the events of September 11, 2001 occurred, little was mentioned about these strange connections, and the possible motives and proximity of Dov Zakheim and his group. Since there was little physical evidence remaining after the events, investigators were left only with photographic and anecdotal evidence.

“There is a photograph of the Flight Termination System module, from their site.(5). Note it has a cylindrical shape, and is consistent with the size and shape of the object observed under the fuselage of flight 175.

“The Boeing lease deal involved the replacement of the aging KC-135 tanker fleet with these smaller, more efficient Boeing 767s that were to be leased by Dov Zakheim's group. The planes were to be refitted with refueling equipment, including lines and nozzle assemblies.”

(Remember both Flight 175, that hit the South Tower, and Flight 11, that hit the North Tower, were Boeing 767s. Flights 77 and 93 were 757s.)

“In the enlargement of flight 175’s photo, we can clearly see a cylindrical object under the fuselage, and a structure that appears to be attached to the right underside of the rear fuselage section.

”When seen in comparison, it is obvious that the plane approaching the Trade Center has both of these structures-the FTS module and the midair refueling equipment, as configured on the modified Boeing 767 tankers. Of particular interest is the long tube-like anomalous structure under the rear fuselage area of flight 175-this structure runs along the right rear bottom of the plane, as it also does on the Boeing 767 refueling tanker pictured.

”After considering this information, I [the author/s] am convinced that flight 175, as pictured on the news media and official reports, was in fact a refitted Boeing 767 tanker, with a Flight Termination System attached. Use of this system would also explain the expert handling of aircraft observed in both New York and Washington investigations, which has been officially credited to inexperienced flight school students.

“Since the refitted 767s were able to carry both passengers and a fuel load, as shown in this photo, it is likely that the plane designated Flight 175 was in fact a refitted 767 tanker, disguised as a conventional commercial passenger plane.

“As shown in this photo of a 767 being serviced, the FTS unit, when in position, would be small and unobtrusive enough to be fairly innocuous (at least to casual observers, such as passengers). The smallest circle indicates the size and position of the anomaly depicted in the photos of Flight 175. The larger circle, which is the size of the engine housing, shows the size of the anomaly in relation to the engine. Note the size and position of the open hatches on the engine housing, which would tend to discredit the widely held theory that the anomaly is an open hatch or cargo door.

“As the . . . diagram shows, all flights involved in the events traveled very near many military installations, and appear to have traveled in a manner suggesting guidance and possible transfer of the control of the planes among the bases.

”Since the evidence from the World Trade Center site was quickly removed, there is little concrete evidence of the involvement of Dov Zakheim, who has since left his position at the Pentagon. However, the proximity of Eglin AFB to MacDill AFB in Florida and Dov Zakheim's work via SPC contracts and the Pentagon leasing agreement on both of these installations, combined with SPC's access to World Trade Center structural and security information from their Tridata investigation in 1993, is highly suspicious. Considering his access to Boeing 767 tankers, remote control flight systems, and his published views in the PNAC document, it seems very likely he is in fact a key figure in the alleged terrorist attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001.”

EDITORIAL RESPONSE TO READERS' COMMENTS:

”In response to some of our readers who have questioned our premise that it was Rabbi Dov Zakheim who 'called for' the Pearl Harbor type of incident, we here at Conspiracy News Net acknowledge that the PNAC document was written by the likes of William Kristol and Donald Kagan, and therefore as the real brains behind the agenda they are the ones calling for it in a literal sense. However, we do stand by our assertion that the Rabbi called for it as well, insofar that he signed his name onto this document. If he signed it he agrees with it and therefore he is calling for it.

”Some of you have argued that we are singling out Rabbi Zakheim because he is Jewish, implying that we are pushing some sort of twisted anti-Semitic agenda while noting that he is not the only one who signed the PNAC document and therefore wondering why our article is about him and not the others. We do not mean to imply that the Rabbi acted alone, our article simply points out that Rabbi Zakheim had access to things like structural integrity, blueprints and any number of important facets of information about the WTC through his work with TRIDATA CORPORATION in the investigation of the bombing of the WTC in 1993.

“That he had access to REMOTE CONTROL Technology through his work at System Planning Corporation (SPC). That he had access to BOEING AIRCRAFT through a lease deal HE BROKERED while working at the Pentagon.

“ . . . Finally that he was part of a group of politically radical Straussian Neo-Conservatives, who, through their association with PNAC, called for restructuring of the Middle East, noting that a Pearl Harbor type of event MAY BE NEEDED to foster the frame of mind required for the American public to accept such a radical foreign policy agenda. In light of all this information we here at Conspiracy News Net stand by our statement that Mr. Zakheim not only called for the slamming of the WTC Towers on 9-11, but he activity took part in their demolition by providing the logistics necessary for such an attack to occur.”

Coda, a Bitter Frosting on the Cake

Whether or not you agree in whole or in part with these findings, here is an eye-opening article originally from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette by Milan Simonich. It is titled Army unit piecing together accounts of Pentagon attack, and from it comes this striking information in paragraph six . . ."One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck.”

Apart from the question of whether it was F 77 that struck the Pentagon, it is more than ironic that accountants, bookkeepers and budgets analysts, the very people who could pick up the financial frauds were struck. Especially since the hit was directed supposedly at the Office of Naval Intelligence.

Nevertheless, Dov is busy at his Booz Allen job, involved in Strategic Services and who knows what other dark plans as we speak, even as the Middle East is under heavy fire once again from Israel and its fervid ally, the US government.

Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York. Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net.



Go to 13267
http://www.rense.com/general35/skolov30.htm
The Overthrow Of The
American Republic - Part 30
Most Forbidden Subject - The U.S. Military
By Sherman H. Skolnick
3-22-3

It was December, 1990. Since August of that year, the American mass media kept telling us that Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi strongman, was the leading devil on the planet. That as an aggressor, we were told, he had invaded Kuwait, the former British colony bordering Iraq. There was plenty, however, that the oil-soaked, spy-riddled monopoly press did NOT tell us, such as:

[1] That in the 1980s, George Herbert Walker Bush had secretly been the PRIVATE business partner of Saddam Hussein. Together, they had extorted tens of billions of dollars from the weak sheikdoms of the Persian Gulf area---"protection money". They were obligated to pay the Bush/Saddam business partnership upwards of five dollars per barrel of crude petroleum shipped to the Western interests. For the decade of the 1980s, this partnership had profitted by upwards of 25 billion dollars per year, a total of upwards of 250 billion dollars for the decade, making Bush/Saddam two of the wealthiest people on the planet.

These funds were quietly laundered through a series of twenty five secret worldwide accounts of the Bush Crime Family. The loot was the same as if this partnership had been operated by the traditional Italian/Sicilian mafia or the latter day, Russian mafiya.

One of the "washing machines", to disguise the funds, was the joint account of the Bush family with the Queen of England, at her private bank, Coutts Bank, London. In just one of the many transactions, one secret Federal Reserve wire transfer record showed the handling of ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS.

By 1991, the secret Federal Reserve records were in the hands of Saddam's half-brother in Switzerland who let it be known that he vowed to release the same if the American CIA engaged in any plot (which they did in 1993) to try to assassinate Saddam. The Saddam relative let it be known in Europe that the records, depending how they were publicized, could cause the criminal prosecution of Daddy Bush for treason. Among the records were the handwritten notes of the key official of the Internal Affairs investigation unit, of the U.S. Treasury, detailing the Bush Crime Family's treasonous 25 worldwide accounts, used to launder the partnership loot of Bush/Saddam.

[By the year 2000, the records having fallen into our possession, we posted the same on our popular website series, "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush", showing the secret authorization codes of the Federal Reserve Commissar together with the secret bank codes and instructions of routing and the Treasury records. Those familiar with such records have pronounced them authentic. The records are attached to our website series, and one by one, can be pulled up on the screen. In 1990-1991, the Daddy Bush/Saddam partnership became the subject of a little-known federal case in Chicago, at a hearing of which I was the only journalist there present and later, interviewing the participants in the back of the courtroom. Details are in my website story, "The Secrets of Timothy McVeigh".]

[2] Not mentioned in the popular press was that the U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad, April Glaspie, had, on behalf of Daddy Bush, then President, told Saddam that the U.S. would NOT interfere if Saddam pursued Iraq's quarrel with Kuwait, as to unlawful slant drilling into Iraqi oilfields and as to Kuwait poaching on oil land that was actually Iraq Province 19.

[3] Iraq was once one of the most wealthy nations and became impoverished in the 1980s, for among other reasons, that Kuwait by these unlawful means, having driven down the price of oil and by stealing Iraqi oil.

[4] Daddy Bush bribed various other nations billions of dollars to join with the U.S. to extract Saddam's troops from Kuwait. The American press fakers peddled a knowingly false satellite photo supposedly showing Saddam's troops gathering for an invasion of Saudi on the Saudi/Kuwait border. It was a terrible fraud calculated to okay what Daddy Bush was doing.

So, in December, 1990, a group hired one of the largest auditoriums in Rosemont, Illinois, a Chicago suburb right near O'Hare International Airport. They advertised they were going to conduct an anti-war rally. A number of speakers were invited to speak. None of them---certainly not me---were members of the group that hired the meeting hall. Each speaker was told to limit themselves to fifteen minutes. I, for one, told no one but my closest trusted longtime associates of the topic I was going to speak about.

The hall was packed. About 750 people had showed up.

Point by point, I discussed the findings of a unit of the United Nations which had documented a terrible truth. Here it was, late in the 20th Century, I told the crowd, that Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, according to undisputed details of the U.N. unit, each had huge numbers of BLACK CHATTEL SLAVES. Saudi, according to the findings, had about one hundred thousand such slaves and Kuwait about fifty thousand of the same. I emphasized that this was done by the Saudi Royal Family and by the Emir of Kuwait, both unelected dictators.

Looking into the faces of the vast audience, I could see a sprinkling of Afro-Americans sitting there. Their expressions and body language told me I had touched a real nerve. Several of the other speakers on the stage with me were well-known black activist celebrities. One had apparently come in a limousine with his bodyguards. None of the other speakers dared comment on or touch upon my subject. (The one with the limo---was he secretly going to comment elsewhere? Why do I say that? Because shortly after his speech, he was murdered.)

I thought to myself that these supposed black civil rights promoters must be on some big, secret corporate/espionage payroll, and they are afraid to touch the black chattel slavery issue as to the U.S. Military. One of the other speakers, I knew from my long-time sources, was installed as the head of an important black activist group, by the secret political police, the American CIA, to steer matters away from such topics.

I went on to point out that the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the 14th Amendment, outlawed slavery in the United States. (The 13th Amendment, ratified December 6, 1865, after the close of the British promoted War Between the States and British-instigated murder of President Lincoln, and the 14th Amendment, ratified, July 9, 1868.)

Thus, it was unconstitutional for Daddy Bush, as then President, to have ordered Black U.S. Military personnel to aid and protect owners of BLACK CHATTEL SLAVES. A sizeable per centage of our troops in the Persian Gulf at that time were blacks. Further, of those, a sizeable number were Black Muslims. Iraq is part of the Southern Hemisphere. Some consider Iraqis as "people of color". Why and how were U.S. black military ordered to protect and aid BLACK CHATTEL SLAVE owners and to soon slaughter a great number of fellow moslems in Iraq?

A woman in the large audience, I found out later, was the sister of a black junior naval officer enroute with his ship to the Persian Gulf. She wrote him about my speech. He took action. He wrote down the substance of my speech and tacked it to the door of his Commanding Officer. The black naval officer was arrested and court martialed for insubordination and clapped into the brig. The liars and whores of the press pretended like it was not news. To no avail, I contacted various media outlets. They were not interested, including lapdog black reporters at various print, radio, and tv facilities. Later, only on my public access Cable TV Program, "Broadsides", was this subject raised again publicly.

The sister of the jailed black naval officer wrote to me of this terrible injustice. It troubles me to realize that my telling the truth caused this to happen.

At the close of the Persian Gulf War in 1991, upwards of 150 thousand Iraqi conscript troops were going back to Iraq while, in effect, under a white flag of surrender. On the "Highway of Death" occurred the most ghastly war crime in the history of the world. President Daddy Bush ordered U.S. military aircraft and ground units to kill these surrendering troops by shooting them in the back, from the air and on the ground. (Was this done by all-white units? There is reason to believe so.) U.S. Military bulldozers were ordered by Bush to bury these slaughtered surrendering Iraqi troops, some of them still alive, in mass, unmarked graves in the desert. Years later one of those so ordered to commit what amounted to war crimes, told me,off the record, with tears in his eyes, his great regrets in retrospect having carried out such an order. Somewhere between 50 to 150 thousand Iraqis thus surrendering were butchered. The American monopoly press, under "war-time" censorship, was ordered to remove from all pictures any showing of dead Iraqi bodies and to show only blown up tanks, military trucks, and such on the "Highway of Death".

In the 1990s, on my public access Cable TV program was one of the only places in the U.S. where was mentioned this dreadful violation of the Geneva Conventions, to which the U.S. is a signatory.

The three leaders of the Persian Gulf War of 1991 were quietly and secretly rewarded, after the war ended by the Al-Sabah Family, the Emir of Kuwait, owners as I stated of black chattel slaves.

President George Herbert Walker Bush received 15 million dollars in gold. General Norman Schwarzkopf received 15 million dollars in diamonds. General Colin Powell received 10 million dollars in gold. (Hey! did the Emir of Kuwait, having black chattel slaves, discriminate against General Powell, an Afro-American, by giving HIM a lesser amount of valuables?)

These benefits to these U.S. officials were unconstitutional rewards, as shown by the U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9, last clause, that provides:

"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States; And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, FROM ANY KING, PRINCE, OR FOREIGN STATE." (Emphasis added.) [Hey! Does this also apply to Daddy Bush, when President, having a JOINT ACCOUNT for ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS with the Queen of England in her private bank as mentioned?]

Other than us, WHO dares raise these same issues? Are not Kuwait and Saudi being protected in Persian Gulf War Two by black GIs with Saudi and Kuwait being owners of BLACK CHATTEL SLAVES?



Go to 13266
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/26/BAU310AJJ9.DTL
Anti-war Cindy Sheehan files to take on Pelosi
John Wildermuth, Chronicle Staff Writer

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Peace activist Cindy Sheehan wants to snatch House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's congressional seat from her in November, but first she's going to need the help - and signatures - of 10,198 friends and supporters.

Sheehan was at San Francisco City Hall on Friday to take out papers for her independent run for Congress, but without those signatures from voters in the district, her name won't show up on the ballot.

"It's an uphill battle," said Sheehan, who vowed to run against Pelosi in July after the speaker refused to start impeachment proceedings against President George Bush. "But I'm excited about the signature-gathering process. It's going to be an opportunity to talk to people about our campaign."

The 50-year-old Sheehan, whose son, Casey, was killed while serving in Iraq in 2004, became the public face of the anti-war movement when she mounted a demonstration outside Bush's Texas ranch that lasted from 2005 to 2007.

Even after pleading exhaustion and closing down "Camp Casey" in May, Sheehan was a regular speaker at anti-war gatherings across the nation. Since moving from Dixon to San Francisco's Mission District, she's been campaigning virtually full time.

To get the signatures, equal to 3 percent of the district voters registered for the 2006 general election, the campaign will have people setting up ironing boards and card tables on street corners throughout the city, seeking voters who want an alternative to Pelosi. Sheehan has until Aug. 8 to collect the needed signatures.

Getting on the ballot will be the easy part for Sheehan. If she becomes a recognized candidate, she'll be challenging one of the best-known and most powerful Democrats in the country in Pelosi, a 10-term incumbent who routinely collects around 80 percent of the vote in the San Francisco-only district.

Election challenges are nothing new to Pelosi, who has faced token Republican opposition in most of her November races, along with occasional primary challenges. But since she beat former San Francisco Supervisor Harry Britt in the 1987 special election to replace the late Rep. Sala Burton, Pelosi's political resume has been short of opponents anyone other than local political junkies has ever heard of.

Sheehan has name recognition, particularly for her Camp Casey crusade.

"I said last year that I was going to take a break (from the anti-war movement) and then come back," Sheehan said in an interview at her Mission Street campaign headquarters.

But when the president commuted White House aide Scooter Libby's prison sentence last summer, she said, she decided "that seeing George Bush impeached would be a victory for humanity."

Calls for impeachment from Sheehan and other progressives didn't move Pelosi, who already had declared that impeachment was "off the table" when it came to the Democratic congressional agenda.

"In this political environment, the speaker has to work for those things that are possible," said Brendan Daly, a spokesman for Pelosi.

An impeachment effort, he said, "would be divisive, we couldn't get the votes, and we would have to spend all our time on it."

There are plenty of congressional Democrats, especially in the Bay Area, who don't agree, including Reps. Lynn Woolsey, Barbara Lee and Pete Stark, along with other progressives, both in and out of office.

Impeachment isn't Sheehan's only concern. Pelosi's refusal to vote for an immediate end to the Iraq war and to support single-payer health care shows she's out of touch with San Francisco's progressive roots, Sheehan said.

"I'll represent everyone in San Francisco, not just the corporate elite," she said. "I'm working class, my family was working class, and we have struggled the same way our neighbors here in San Francisco have struggled."

There's nothing unusual about Pelosi taking fire from the left, said Daly, her spokesman, especially when the speaker has to be concerned not only about her district, but also about the party across the country.

Pelosi "has always been forceful about speaking her mind on issues like human rights in China and the war in Iraq," he said. "In San Francisco, there's always tension between the district and the leadership responsibility."

The speaker will get an early look at the unhappiness of the city's progressives, because she's being challenged by local activist Shirley Golub in the June 3 Democratic primary.

"I've just had the sense from people I've talked to that (Pelosi) hasn't done what people in the community want her to do," Golub said. "People now have a choice, and they haven't had a Democratic choice for a long, long time."

Despite the upbeat talk, Sheehan and Golub, along with Republican Dana Walsh and Libertarian Philip Berg in November, are the longest of longshots to give Pelosi even a moment's worry on election day. In a district where Democrats outnumber Republicans 56 percent to 10 percent and a state where incumbents almost never lose, a party leader like Pelosi has every right to be making plans for her next term in office.

The odds don't bother Sheehan, who has raised more than $100,000 for her race, most of it from outside the district.

"Even people who I won't represent are willing to back me, because they know what I'll do in office," she said. "Many people in San Francisco know me, and they know my persistence.

"If I get to Washington, I'll only be in office a couple weeks before Bush leaves, but I guarantee he'll know I'm there."

E-mail John Wildermuth at jwildermuth@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page B - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle



Go to 13265
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/04/25/notes042508.DTL
All the president's liars
Fun new game! Which TV news "military expert" is really a whore for the Bush administration? (Hint: all of them)
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist

Friday, April 25, 2008
Did it work? Were you duped?

Were you calmly and methodically and rather nefariously led to believe that maybe, just maybe, the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan and Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and the rest, right along with tales of soldier suicides and torture and staggering civilian body counts and the utterly disastrous Bush military policy weren't really all that bad after all?

Did you watch any CNN or Fox News or MSNBC, lo, these past five or six years, listen to the pundits and ponder the wise, informed comments of all the military experts the networks brought on to discuss Iraq policy, then conclude that maybe this war, this appalling invasion might actually be positive, that maybe the surge is working and torture ain't all that bad and the democracy is taking root and America is proud and perky and victorious once again?

Did you believe any of it? Because oh my God, they sure as hell worked us over like a rabid dog works a hunk of gristle.

Who are "they," exactly? Why, they're the newly discovered and rather unexpected fraternity of expert BS artists, a highly specialized group known to gullible Americans as stoic, stern-faced retired generals, colonels, majors, military advisers, former Pentagon officials, the ones you've heard and seen on TV news for years, but who are known to the Bush administration as a delightfully dishonest gaggle of preferred liars, lackeys, shills, puppets and mouthpieces for Dick Cheney and Donny Rumsfeld and Dubya himself.

The truth is as sad as it is revolting: You have been lied to, again and again, perhaps even more than you imagined, in a rather unexpected way, perhaps like no other time in American history, in a more carefully orchestrated and widespread effort than any presidential administration has managed to attempt in the past.

Here is the New York Times, still managing to do what it does best despite the era of dying newspapers and disrespected journalism, running a simply astonishing piece on all the dishonest "military consultants" who've appeared for the past half decade on every major network — and yes, Fox adores these liars best of all — to discuss Iraq, surges, U.S. military strategy, the works.

Here is the Times revealing, after two years of battling the Defense Department to release the 8,000 pages of incriminating documents by way of instigating lawsuits and leveraging the Freedom of Information Act — and barely even then — that this entire dour fraternity of deceitful military cretins has been in service of BushCo since Sept. 11 — and still is, to this very day.

To clarify: Whenever you've seen one of those dour-faced retired generals discussing details of U.S. war strategy on MSNBC, chances are staggeringly good he was/is in the pocket of Rummy or Cheney. Whenever a wise old colonel has appeared on Fox or CNN or CBS News to say the surge is working or troop morale is strong or that all those suicide bombings aren't really so bad, chances are overwhelmingly good that he is lying outright and you're hearing exactly what Donald Rumsfeld wanted him to say. Isn't that refreshing?

The Times story is simply astounding. Up and down the line, from major to general to colonel to every sort of expert they have, it's the same story. Over and over again, presented "tens of thousands of times" and totaling countless hundreds of TV and radio hours, it's been a near constant stream of calculated deception and misrepresentation and bogus pro-Iraq spin. Neutrality? Fair analysis of the war? Criticism of Bush? Not a chance.

You may ask: Why would they do such a thing? What's in it for the generals and the colonels to lie outright to the American populace and the embarrassingly blind news networks, to whore their credentials and trash their distinguished reputations in favor of defending a lost war and useless president?

That's easy: Access. Access to the White House, to the corridors of power and influence; access to the perks and the pals and snifters of brandy, the backroom handshakes, the business deals, the hugely lucrative military contracts, the sweet, sweet piles of cash and privilege and power awaiting them if they just toe the line and keep their real opinions to themselves. Also worth mentioning: Many are military men down to the bone. Failed war and inept commander in chief or no, they will defend any U.S. military operation, simply because it's a U.S. military operation. It's just automatic.

Reminds me, in a depressing sort of way, of that gaggle of Big Tobacco CEOs who banded together not long ago in a hilarious attempt to convince the nation — and the courts — that cigarettes aren't all that bad and there's little evidence smoking causes cancer or impotence or death, and in fact small children really love secondhand smoke and so do puppies and flowers and Jesus, and if you want to have fun sometime, walk into a hospital nursery and fire up a fresh Marlboro and blow that yummy smoke straight into the faces of the newborns. Watch them squirm with delight!

Except wait, no, it's not like that at all. One major difference: Big Tobacco execs are professional liars, de facto and a priori and understood. It's what they do. Not even the most ardent smoking advocate would trust one those jackals as far as he could throw him into a vat of chemotherapy drugs.

Different, at least in theory, with these high-grade military men. They have a potent aura of trustworthiness, fairness, decency. They are f—ing generals, for chrissakes, and hence we like to think of them as straight-talking, no-BS working men whose word is solid and whose authority unquestionable and therefore no wimp-assed monkey-faced president or scabrous Defense secretary could make them say something they didn't actually believe.

Wrong. Oh, how horribly wrong.

So I ask again, did it work? Was America duped? Well, yes and no. There's little doubt that this insidious, sustained PR attack — and make no mistake, it was/is an attack on the American people; such calculated "psychological operations" aimed at U.S. citizens are actually very illegal, though it's enormously difficult to prove so in court — swayed millions of Americans, gave fuel to the preemptive attack argument, inflamed (and still inflames) the warmongering right, scammed the media, fanned the pro-war fires for years before the public recoil finally kicked in.

But oh, kick in it did. This is the fascinating thing. Even all those high-ranking military experts lying like well-decorated dogs in one of the most impressive, appalling PR campaigns in American history could not keep Bush from collapsing, could not prevent Americans from learning the real facts of the failed war and toxic presidency — eventually.

And maybe this is a good thing. Because now, given the scope of the Bush administration's lies — the true scale of which we may never fully know — the recoil is even more forceful than it ever might've been, the anti-neocon, anti-Bush revolt is potent and heartening and enormously helpful to the Democratic cause, perhaps far more than if Bush and his cronies had told the truth in the first place.

Then again, if they had been the slightest bit honest, if Bush had even a hint of integrity, we'd never have launched this staggeringly botched, futile war in the first place, and maybe we wouldn't be where we are now, with the American experiment under Bush far less of an experiment and far more of a cyanide tablet.



Go to 13264
http://www.patriot.dk/churchill.html
Zionism versus Bolshevism.
Illustrated Sunday Herald

February 8, 1920, page 5

Mr Churchill's authorship of this article has been authenticated by one of the world's leading Churchill bibliographers, Richard Heinzkill, of the University of Eugene, Oregon.

A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People

By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.

SOME people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.

And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.

The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and successful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia's economic resources, and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain.



International Jews.

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus--Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.



Terrorist Jews.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and an the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution: by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.

The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.



"Protector of the Jews."

Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin's authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews. The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate. to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms. The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated.



A Home for the Jews.

Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism.

Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.

The article is reproduced without editing apart from typographical



Here is a direct quote from the correspondence of Karl Marx with another Jew, Baruch Levy, quoted in the "La Revue de Paris," June 1, 1928, page 574:

"In the new organization of mankind, the children of Israel [the Jews] will spread over the whole surface of the earth and will become everywhere, without opposition, the leading element, especially if they can impose upon workings classes the firm control of some of the them. The governments of the nations forming the Universal Republic will pass without effort into the hands of the Jews under the cover of the victory of the proletariat, private property will then be suppressed by the rulers of Jewish race, who will everywhere control public funds. Thus will be realized the Talmudic promise that, when come the times of the Messiah, Jews will possess the wealth of all peoples of the world".



In the Congressional Record, published by the United States Government Printing Office, Proceedings of the House, 1957, page 8559 you can read the following:

"Israel Cohen, a leading Communist in England, in his A Racial Program For the Twentieth Century, wrote [in 1912]:

'We must realize that our Party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have have been oppressed by the whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites , we will instill into the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America into our hands'."



Go to 13263
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=10
Churchill & The International Jew

- February 8 1920 (Illustrated Sunday Herald): CHURCHILL’S SUPPRESSED ARTICLE INDICTING “THE INTERNATIONAL JEW” RE-EMERGES ON THE INTERNET!~ On the above date, Winston Churchill penned a since-suppressed article,
“Zionism versus Bolshevism,” in which he wrote: “The Jewish Bolsheviks are producing a philosophy as malevolent as Christianity is benevolent - which, if not arrested will shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible.”

~ Churchill goes on to say, The International Jew has forsaken the faith of his forefathers and divorced from his mind all spiritual hopes of the next world. This world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization on the basis of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.” SEE: Churchill’s Zionism versus Bolshevism @ http://www.patriot.dk/churchill.html

admin @ September 11, 2007

« Jew “Sumner Redstone” Runs Homosexual TV An “International Jew” At Work »
11 Comments
Churchill
September 17, 2007 @ 1:28 am
Churchill was himself a Jew.

“Cunning, no doubt, came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother Lady Randolph Churchill, nee Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.” Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post, Jan. 18, 1993.

Ben Shwartz
February 7, 2008 @ 12:47 am
“Churchill was himself a Jew.

“Cunning, no doubt, came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother Lady Randolph Churchill, nee Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.” Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post, Jan. 18, 1993.”

Churchill was a Christian, and weather he has jewish heritage is dabatable! As far as he was concerned he had a touch of native American Indian from his mothers side.Having some semitic aka Jewish blood, does not make you jew when your a Christaian and oust them out.Brother Kapner is born a Jew yet is Christian.Nobody would argue his chosen faith,Nor should you the faith Churchill was born into.

Paul
February 7, 2008 @ 9:15 am
Churchill was, for most of his life, an agent for Lord Rothschild who bailed him out of debt. From that point forth (1920 something) he did his masters bidding.

Churchill lost the british empire in a wholly unnecessary and avoidable conflict with Germany. Mein Kampf was banned in England because it was obvious that it contained only two themes:

1 Extreme concern and criticism of the Jews within Germany’s borders.

2 A love of England.

Churchill was a Zionist dupe, a massive ego on legs and hence relatively easy to coerce.

He did save Britain in WW2, but it was from a war that he played a part in bringing about.

carl f hutchinson
March 30, 2008 @ 8:44 pm
churchill had jewish connections and his job was to bring the USA into the great war.yes,roosevelt had jewish connections along with hilter also. was hilter killed in the war ? probably he died of old age somewhere in the USA. churchill was a mason of high degree and a druid ; a believer in the occult and the kabbalist teaching of the talmud (the teaching of the elders) churchill is the father of queen elizabeth II of great briton and not George VI…so we have a new seed line (so to speak) in the british royal family.Jacob passed the blessing on to Josephs two sons (furthermore he said let my name be given to them (Israel) two nations..one older and one younger. NOW who do you think these two nations are? The HOUSE of JUDA (juda and benjamen) has no right to be called Israel. the house of Israel (the ten tribes of the north would not let themselves be called jew. (All Israel is going to be saved (after much TRIBULATION) this is a people ,a nation that wasn’t anation but will be a nation )The seed of Abraham ,which is Spiritually so.

Jack Delmar Johnston
March 30, 2008 @ 11:02 pm
David Irvings assertion that the name Jerome had been changed from Jacobson could not be proven. The Jeromes were traced to Timothy Jerome, a Huguenot, who arrived in America in 1717. Irving,whose reputation for truth is shaky, got this from an article by Moshe Kohn in the Jerusalem Post 1/15/93. Irving got the date wrong as 1/18/93. The article can be accessed online through the JP archives. Kohn used Churchill as an example for Israeli politicians to follow. The mention of Churchill being jewish was sarcasm directed at “revisionists” whom Kohn did not name but speculatively was Irving and John Charmley.

Churchills new york city relatives and their friends belonged to organizations which did not accept jews. Leonard Jerome owned an interest in the new york times in the 1850s and the jewish family who now owns the nyt bought it during the civil war but that is no proof of Jerome jewishness. Leonard Jerome made,lost and remade fortunes in various ways.The fact that the Jeromes,their relatives and friends belonged to organizations which did not accept jews is strong evidence that the Jeromes were not and had never been jews.

admin
March 30, 2008 @ 11:17 pm
Dear Jack,

I have been doing much research on Churchill and all of his Jewish connections including his mother’s Jewish extraction and including his Jewish buddies in the Roosevelt administration.

Stay tuned for an upcoming article on Churchill entitled “Churchill Was Bought By The Jews.” Here on REAL JEW NEWS sometime in April-May 2008. +BN

Churchill
March 31, 2008 @ 2:49 am
Not only was Churchill a Jew, but so are Bush, Blair, Putin, Merkel, Sarkosy and many other world leaders are all Jews.

See for yourself (PHOTOS):

Go to 13262
http://linuxhelp.150m.com/jews/JewLeaders.htm
Go to 13261
http://linux.50webs.org/jews/JewLeaders.htm
Go to 13260
http://chapelhill.indymedia.org/news/2007/01/29307.php

Churchill is GW Bush’s 8th cousin.

admin
March 31, 2008 @ 6:36 am
Dear Churchill,

You don’t know what you are talking about:

Bush has NO Jewish ancestry whatsoever. Neither does Blair or Putin or Merkel. You are an ignoramous.

+BN

Jack Delmar Johnston
April 1, 2008 @ 2:35 pm
BRN: I made inquiry as to your wellbeing.Glad to see you are still “talking”. Churchill’s cousin Shane Leslie allegedly uncovered information that the Jerome’s were jewish however was asked by Churchill not to reveal this info (I do not know who made this allegation).However,when Leslie published his own autobiography including his relationship to the Jeromes he did not mention the Jerome’s being jewish and this ab was published after Ch’s death.

Ch. is on record as greatly admiring the comprehensive jew and apparently was provided financial support by Rothchild.

It is apparent that Ch had tremendous energy and the resolute stubborness of the English. It is also apparent that Ch was a poorly educated ignoramous whose ego not ability was his driving force. The defeat of the British at Galipoli was due to an attempt by the British army general staff to salvage the disasterous Dardenelle campaign created and pushed by Churchill. 22 men from Sandringham were killed in this battle. QE2 knew all of these men personally and it was a great loss to the royal family. This caused Ch much embarrasment and increased his chagrin toward the Germans. He blamed them for his mistake. He made a similar blunder in WW2 with his failed Norweigan sea campaign, again which the British general staff opposed.

Ch. was able to interject himself into government matters due to his royal lineage, his tremendous energy and his resolute,unshakeable conviction that “he” was “needed” and that only “he” could resolve the grave issues Britain faced in both WW’s. It seems that even though he had a reputation for botching things up he had the energy and connections that made him an unstoppable force. Awaiting your next article. JDJ

Jack Delmar Johnston
April 1, 2008 @ 3:38 pm
My objection to “jews” is due to the supremist assumption of judaism that jews were “chosen by God”,that ALL others are fodder for predatory commerce, a failure to admit that jews were murdering people by the millions in the bolshevik/communist Soviet Union long before the nazis were in power,the use of the term holocaust in reference to only jews, the continous implicit denial that more nonjews were nazi holocaust victims than jews,the nazis murdered between 12-18 million people approximately 5.7million were jews but the other over 6-12 million were nonjews and jews treat these victims as if they are not deserving of remembrance, undeserving of remembrance of their ultimate sacrifice as if “oh well, these “others” were nonjews, not “really” people just subhuman livestock whose deaths at the hand of tyranny deserve no mention”.

Lenin, who had a jewish grandfather , was supported largely by jews.Lenin with the jews who supported him executed over 20 million soviet citizens . Over 10 million Ukranian farmers were executed by jews collectivising their land for the bolshevik/communist state. This is rarely mentioned and not at all by jews.Stalin went on to execute more than 40million more soviet citizens and stalin put jews in charge of his extermination camps. Lenin,stalin and the jews who supported them established hundreds of death camps along 8000 miles of the transsiberian railroad.Soviet citizens were taken by railcars, packed in like livestock to these murder camps run by jews where they were summarily shot and buried in mass graves. There are thousands of mass graves in siberia wherein lies the bodies of over 60million victims of genocide committed by jews.A documentary appeared on PBS documenting this genocide and one former executioner was interviewed. He said that it was if these murdered people never existed and it is unequivically apparent that in the minds of jews these victims of jew genocide do not exist, should not exist and that any mention of genocide by jews should be a crime.

I object to the jew ritual garb. There is no difference in wearing a beanie signifying “chosen by God status” and wearing a swastika. There is no difference in celebration of jewish “holidays” and clebrating nazi “holidays”. Supremist cults are ALL tyrannical and failure to condemn them ALL is to imply that genocide by some cult/s is acceptable.

There is no transparency of the comprehensive jew and how their attitudes and behaviors effect everyone else.So it is with ANY cult. Jews can arguably be said to be the cause of most of the problems of the western world. The architects of the disasterous, corrupt and criminal action in Iraq

Jack Delmar Johnston
April 1, 2008 @ 4:17 pm
(continued)are jews ,Paul Wolfiwitz and Richaed Pearle, members of a cabal of jews within the current administration. Lt.Gen(retired)had worked an agreement with the Iraqi generals during the first year of occupation wherein 10,000 Iraqi police would have been provided to reestablish and maintain order thus allowing for a withdrawal of allied forces. Instead bush sent the incompetent fool paul bremer armed with the plan from wolfiwitz and pearle to totally dismantle the Iraqi Bath political party (wolfiwitz and pearle felt the Bathist were nazis)which was the underlying order for Iraq thereby totalling destroying Garners efforts which would have allowed allied forces to leave Iraq within 18months of invasion. This was aired in a PBS special but there was scant mention of this in the media. The issue of transparency comes up as to why only scant mention by the media. Well perhaps it is because the”media”, print, television, movie industry, banking is controlled by jews. The New York Times has been owned by jews since the civil war,ABC television was started by Leon Goldenrod,a jew,NBC television was started by Bill Pailey, a jew, CBS television was started by Larry Tisch, a jew and their respective families and jewish associates still maintain control; Ben Stein , a jew, wrote an article listing the names of the executives of the major movie studios and production houses in hollywood, they are ALL jews.

So, I object strongly to jews (even ordinary jews) presenting themselves,their relatives and their “culture” as victims. I object and resent jews who “believe” jews,jewishness,jewish people to be victims. jews, jewishness, jewish people are no more victims than any others who have been the object of tyranny. Let jews admit this. Let jews finance and carry on a campaign of transparency which admits to jew guilt in the genocide of over 60million, of the jew belief that jews are superior and that any others are simply economic fodder for the welfare of jews. Let jews step up and admit and take responsibility for their predatory actions in the past and their supremist mindset in the p[resent. That done I will have no objection whatsoever to the comprehensive jew. Thank you BRN



Use your Go Back and Go Forward commands to get to where you were in a previous file.